JHS ADIYAR ROOM NO.1 PS 375
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP298 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 298 | 54.88% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 160 | 29.47% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 63 | 11.60% | |
| 4 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 6 | 1.10% | |
| 5 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 543 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 298 | 54.38% | 1 | 73 | Strong |
| BSP | 160 | 29.20% | 2 | 63 | Average |
| AD | 63 | 11.50% | 3 | 346 | Weak |
| AAP | 6 | 1.09% | 4 | 40 | Poor |
| JDU | 4 | 0.73% | 5 | 61 | Poor |
| BRDP | 3 | 0.55% | 6 | 242 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.55% | 7 | 228 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.55% | 8 | 102 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 114 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 340 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 380 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 379 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.