P.S.SURERI CLASS -1 PS 366
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP291 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 291 | 46.34% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 245 | 39.01% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 64 | 10.19% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 6 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 628 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 291 | 45.90% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| AD | 245 | 38.64% | 2 | 121 | Average |
| BSP | 64 | 10.09% | 3 | 192 | Weak |
| BRDP | 5 | 0.79% | 4 | 135 | Poor |
| RSP | 5 | 0.79% | 5 | 127 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.63% | 6 | 86 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.63% | 7 | 160 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.63% | 8 | 57 | Poor |
| BSSP | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 133 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.32% | 10 | 167 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 271 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 239 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.