P.S. MUGAUNA PS 357
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP314 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 314 | 42.43% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 197 | 26.62% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 194 | 26.22% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 11 | 1.49% | |
| 5 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 10 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 7 | 0.95% | |
| 7 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 740 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 314 | 41.92% | 1 | 60 | Strong |
| AD | 197 | 26.30% | 2 | 194 | Average |
| BSP | 194 | 25.90% | 3 | 39 | Average |
| RSP | 11 | 1.47% | 4 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 10 | 1.34% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 0.93% | 6 | 42 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.27% | 7 | 180 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 172 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 111 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 342 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 372 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 374 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.