P.S.MADI ROOM NO.2 PS 301
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP183 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 183 | 45.86% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 157 | 39.35% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 42 | 10.53% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 8 | 2.01% | |
| 5 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 183 | 45.75% | 1 | 180 | Strong |
| BSP | 157 | 39.25% | 2 | 67 | Average |
| AD | 42 | 10.50% | 3 | 359 | Weak |
| INC | 8 | 2.00% | 4 | 28 | Poor |
| LP | 3 | 0.75% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 278 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.50% | 6 | 224 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 336 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 254 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 368 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 360 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 359 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.