P.S KISHUNPUR ISHIT SHALARPUR PS 3
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD390 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 390 | 63.31% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 172 | 27.92% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 16 | 2.60% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 14 | 2.27% | |
| 5 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 9 | 1.46% | |
| 6 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 616 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 390 | 62.40% | 1 | 20 | Strong |
| SP | 172 | 27.52% | 2 | 198 | Average |
| BSP | 16 | 2.56% | 3 | 294 | Poor |
| RSP | 14 | 2.24% | 4 | 12 | Poor |
| BRDP | 9 | 1.44% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| BSSP | 4 | 0.64% | 6 | 33 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.64% | 7 | 27 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.48% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 103 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 239 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 117 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 272 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.