J.H.S.BHAVANIGANJ STITH GRAM KHARGASIPUR PS 296
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP288 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 288 | 39.94% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 236 | 32.73% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 166 | 23.02% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 6 | 0.83% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 5 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 721 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 288 | 39.67% | 1 | 81 | Average |
| BSP | 236 | 32.51% | 2 | 23 | Average |
| AD | 166 | 22.87% | 3 | 233 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 0.83% | 4 | 70 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.69% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| JDU | 4 | 0.55% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| BRDP | 4 | 0.55% | 6 | 181 | Poor |
| RSP | 4 | 0.55% | 8 | 159 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.41% | 10 | 73 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.41% | 9 | 69 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 221 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 287 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.