P.S.PATTI KIRAT RAY CLASS -1 PS 281
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP190 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 190 | 35.92% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 166 | 31.38% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 147 | 27.79% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 7 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 11 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 529 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 190 | 35.65% | 1 | 173 | Average |
| AD | 166 | 31.14% | 2 | 232 | Average |
| BSP | 147 | 27.58% | 3 | 80 | Average |
| INC | 5 | 0.94% | 5 | 100 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.94% | 4 | 56 | Poor |
| RSP | 5 | 0.94% | 6 | 121 | Poor |
| BSSP | 4 | 0.75% | 7 | 40 | Poor |
| BRDP | 2 | 0.38% | 8 | 283 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.38% | 9 | 164 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.38% | 10 | 158 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 242 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.