K.P.S. PUREDAYAL WEST SIDE PS 266
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP284 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 284 | 49.65% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 268 | 46.85% | |
| 3 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 6 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 572 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 284 | 49.31% | 1 | 83 | Strong |
| AD | 268 | 46.53% | 2 | 89 | Strong |
| RSP | 6 | 1.04% | 3 | 84 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.69% | 4 | 46 | Poor |
| JDU | 3 | 0.52% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 369 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 6 | 215 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 332 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 338 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 269 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 342 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.