P.S. KOTIGAON CLASS -3 PS 261
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD262 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 262 | 59.68% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 100 | 22.78% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 53 | 12.07% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 6 | 1.37% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 5 | 1.14% | |
| 6 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 439 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 262 | 59.28% | 1 | 92 | Strong |
| SP | 100 | 22.62% | 2 | 293 | Weak |
| BSP | 53 | 11.99% | 3 | 209 | Weak |
| BRDP | 6 | 1.36% | 4 | 79 | Poor |
| RSP | 5 | 1.13% | 5 | 119 | Poor |
| LP | 3 | 0.68% | 8 | 38 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.68% | 6 | 139 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.68% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.45% | 9 | 153 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 337 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 268 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 353 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.