P.S.PACHAWAL CLASS -2 PS 243
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP225 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 225 | 43.77% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 130 | 25.29% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 114 | 22.18% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 10 | 1.95% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 9 | 1.75% | |
| 6 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 8 | 1.56% | |
| 7 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 514 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 225 | 42.61% | 1 | 125 | Strong |
| AD | 130 | 24.62% | 2 | 278 | Weak |
| BSP | 114 | 21.59% | 3 | 123 | Weak |
| RSP | 10 | 1.89% | 4 | 26 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.70% | 5 | 1 | Poor |
| JDU | 8 | 1.52% | 6 | 10 | Poor |
| BRDP | 7 | 1.33% | 7 | 50 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.57% | 8 | 201 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.57% | 9 | 71 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.38% | 10 | 210 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.38% | 11 | 93 | Poor |
| BSSP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 210 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.