S.S JAGDISHPUR SAMITI ISHIT ASHANANDPUR PS 240
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP147 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 147 | 47.27% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 86 | 27.65% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 45 | 14.47% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 20 | 6.43% | |
| 5 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 6 | 1.93% | |
| 6 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 3 | 0.96% | |
| 7 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 311 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 147 | 46.82% | 1 | 235 | Strong |
| BSP | 86 | 27.39% | 2 | 154 | Average |
| AD | 45 | 14.33% | 3 | 355 | Weak |
| RSP | 20 | 6.37% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.91% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.96% | 6 | 135 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.64% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.64% | 7 | 152 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 344 | Poor |
| BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 371 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 345 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.