P.S. BHIURA ROOM NO.2 PS 238
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP188 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 188 | 54.49% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 76 | 22.03% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 72 | 20.87% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 5 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 345 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 188 | 54.02% | 1 | 175 | Strong |
| BSP | 76 | 21.84% | 2 | 170 | Weak |
| AD | 72 | 20.69% | 3 | 340 | Weak |
| INC | 2 | 0.57% | 4 | 272 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.57% | 5 | 148 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.29% | 9 | 198 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.29% | 8 | 262 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.29% | 7 | 330 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.29% | 10 | 232 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.29% | 6 | 277 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 344 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 368 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.