P.S. ASHAPUR WEST SIDE PS 225
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD202 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 202 | 43.82% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 196 | 42.52% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 38 | 8.24% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 9 | 1.95% | |
| 5 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 6 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 461 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 202 | 43.53% | 1 | 184 | Strong |
| BSP | 196 | 42.24% | 2 | 38 | Strong |
| SP | 38 | 8.19% | 3 | 359 | Poor |
| BRDP | 9 | 1.94% | 4 | 16 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.08% | 5 | 95 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.65% | 6 | 62 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 146 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.43% | 9 | 133 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 269 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 272 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 258 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 327 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.