P.S.ASHAPUR EAST SIDE PS 224
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD235 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 235 | 49.58% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 216 | 45.57% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 8 | 1.69% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 5 | 1.05% | |
| 5 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 3 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 474 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 235 | 49.47% | 1 | 134 | Strong |
| SP | 216 | 45.47% | 2 | 135 | Strong |
| BSP | 8 | 1.68% | 3 | 331 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.05% | 4 | 94 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.63% | 5 | 130 | Poor |
| BSSP | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 108 | Poor |
| BRDP | 2 | 0.42% | 6 | 277 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 257 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 320 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 229 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 336 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 326 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.