P.S.SAPAHI PACHURAKHI PS 217
ANAND DUBEY
BSPBSP268 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 268 | 47.60% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 164 | 29.13% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 112 | 19.89% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 8 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 563 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 268 | 46.94% | 1 | 14 | Strong |
| AD | 164 | 28.72% | 2 | 237 | Average |
| SP | 112 | 19.61% | 3 | 281 | Weak |
| RSP | 4 | 0.70% | 5 | 151 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.70% | 4 | 136 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.53% | 6 | 61 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.53% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 207 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.35% | 9 | 147 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 328 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 332 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 322 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.