P.S.GANDHAUNA CLASS-1 PS 205
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD275 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 275 | 53.82% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 189 | 36.99% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 33 | 6.46% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 6 | 1.17% | |
| 5 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 7 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 511 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 275 | 53.19% | 1 | 82 | Strong |
| BSP | 189 | 36.56% | 2 | 44 | Average |
| SP | 33 | 6.38% | 3 | 364 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.16% | 4 | 59 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.58% | 5 | 59 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 145 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 230 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 223 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 340 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 317 | Poor |
| BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 366 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.