P.S. PAREWA WEST SIDE PS 186
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD378 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 378 | 61.87% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 183 | 29.95% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 20 | 3.27% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 11 | 1.80% | |
| 5 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 6 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 611 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 378 | 61.66% | 1 | 23 | Strong |
| SP | 183 | 29.85% | 2 | 179 | Average |
| BSP | 20 | 3.26% | 3 | 283 | Poor |
| RSP | 11 | 1.79% | 4 | 23 | Poor |
| BRDP | 6 | 0.98% | 5 | 72 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.82% | 6 | 53 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.49% | 8 | 65 | Poor |
| JDU | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 183 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 329 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 339 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.