P.S.SEUR SOUTH SIDE PS 160
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD407 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 407 | 61.48% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 118 | 17.82% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 117 | 17.67% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 6 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 662 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 407 | 61.30% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| BSP | 118 | 17.77% | 2 | 116 | Weak |
| SP | 117 | 17.62% | 3 | 272 | Weak |
| BRDP | 7 | 1.05% | 4 | 44 | Poor |
| RSP | 3 | 0.45% | 5 | 196 | Poor |
| BSSP | 2 | 0.30% | 6 | 98 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 260 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 135 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 220 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 173 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 210 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 261 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.