P.S AURAILA EAST SIDE PS 16
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP416 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 416 | 66.24% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 171 | 27.23% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 29 | 4.62% | |
| 4 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 6 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 628 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 416 | 66.03% | 1 | 21 | Strong |
| BSP | 171 | 27.14% | 2 | 53 | Average |
| AD | 29 | 4.60% | 3 | 364 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.63% | 4 | 109 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.32% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 224 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 121 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 183 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 271 | Poor |
| BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 344 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 260 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.