PANCHAYAT BHAVAN BANJARI PS 145
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD247 votes at this polling station
over ANAND DUBEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 247 | 35.85% | |
| 2 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 216 | 31.35% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 178 | 25.83% | |
| 4 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 15 | 2.18% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 11 | 1.60% | |
| 6 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 9 | 1.31% | |
| 7 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 5 | 0.73% | |
| 8 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 689 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 247 | 35.69% | 1 | 118 | Average |
| BSP | 216 | 31.21% | 2 | 32 | Average |
| SP | 178 | 25.72% | 3 | 189 | Average |
| BSSP | 15 | 2.17% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| RSP | 11 | 1.59% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.30% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| BRDP | 5 | 0.72% | 7 | 107 | Poor |
| LP | 3 | 0.43% | 8 | 31 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.29% | 10 | 116 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 192 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 214 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.