P.S.GOPALAPUR EAST SIDE PS 128
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP329 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 329 | 56.43% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 238 | 40.82% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 5 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 6 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 583 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 329 | 56.34% | 1 | 51 | Strong |
| AD | 238 | 40.75% | 2 | 127 | Strong |
| BRDP | 4 | 0.68% | 3 | 160 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.68% | 4 | 356 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.34% | 5 | 73 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 247 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 229 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 199 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 258 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 308 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 302 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.