PS PURA MOHABBAT ROOM NO.2 PS 43

AC 367 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

LUCKY YADAV

SPSP

321 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

68 10.1 pp

votes

over DHANANJAY SINGH (JDU)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,177

Total turnout676votes cast at this station

Turnout %57.4% of this booth's roll

Male electors315

Female electors361

Vote share in this booth

of 676 votes counted

SP 47.5% JDU 37.4% BSP 8.1% BJP 5.5% AAP 0.4% LP 0.3% BMP 0.3% BSP 0.1% BDNP 0.1% INC 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	LUCKY YADAV	SP	321	47.49%
2	DHANANJAY SINGH	JDU	253	37.43%
3	SHAILENDRA YADAV	BSP	55	8.14%
4	KRISHNA PRATAP SINGH K.P.	BJP	37	5.47%
5	JAY PRAKASH	AAP	3	0.44%
6	AVANISH TIWARI PRINCE	LP	2	0.30%
7	MANOJ YADAV	BMP	2	0.30%
8	RAHUL SINGH	BSP	1	0.15%
9	VISHAL PANDEY	BDNP	1	0.15%
10	PUSHPA SHUKLA	INC	1	0.15%
11	MUSTAKIM	IND	0	0.00%
12	NAVEEN KUMAR	VPI	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 676 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

11 parties · AC 367

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	321	47.49%	1	102	Strong
JDU	253	37.43%	2	90	Average
BSP	56	8.28%	3	167	Poor
BJP	37	5.47%	4	196	Poor
AAP	3	0.44%	5	317	Poor
BMP	2	0.30%	6	32	Poor
LP	2	0.30%	7	118	Poor
INC	1	0.15%	9	290	Poor
BDNP	1	0.15%	8	187	Poor
IND	0	0.00%	10	319	Poor
VPI	0	0.00%	11	315	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 367, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.