P S AMAWAKALA WEST SIDE PS 87
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD301 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 301 | 50.67% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 151 | 25.42% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 108 | 18.18% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 10 | 1.68% | |
| 5 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 8 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 8 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | VINOD | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 594 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 301 | 49.92% | 1 | 78 | Strong |
| BSP | 151 | 25.04% | 2 | 136 | Average |
| SP | 108 | 17.91% | 3 | 338 | Weak |
| VIP | 10 | 1.66% | 4 | 63 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.33% | 5 | 11 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 5 | 0.83% | 6 | 232 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.50% | 7 | 175 | Poor |
| MAP | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 73 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 58 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.17% | 12 | 242 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 120 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 198 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 285 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.