P S SUKARNAKALA WEST SIDE PS 59
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP231 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 231 | 41.18% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 168 | 29.95% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 145 | 25.85% | |
| 4 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 5 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 561 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 231 | 40.81% | 1 | 44 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 168 | 29.68% | 2 | 236 | Average |
| SP | 145 | 25.62% | 3 | 263 | Average |
| VIP | 4 | 0.71% | 5 | 176 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.71% | 4 | 115 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.53% | 6 | 275 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 85 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 152 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 126 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 212 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 291 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 264 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 275 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.