P S KAMMARPUR EAST SIDE PS 56
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD301 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 301 | 39.04% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 259 | 33.59% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 184 | 23.87% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 9 | 1.17% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 5 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 771 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 301 | 38.25% | 1 | 77 | Average |
| BSP | 259 | 32.91% | 2 | 27 | Average |
| SP | 184 | 23.38% | 3 | 201 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 9 | 1.14% | 4 | 176 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.64% | 5 | 80 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.51% | 6 | 39 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.38% | 7 | 225 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.25% | 8 | 84 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 178 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.13% | 11 | 125 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.13% | 12 | 211 | Poor |
| BNKP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 138 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 263 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.