P S SUITHAKALA SECOND PS 48
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD411 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 411 | 60.89% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 112 | 16.59% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 90 | 13.33% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 34 | 5.04% | |
| 5 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 11 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 8 | VINOD | IND | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 675 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 411 | 60.35% | 1 | 22 | Strong |
| SP | 112 | 16.45% | 2 | 323 | Weak |
| BSP | 90 | 13.22% | 3 | 234 | Weak |
| VIP | 34 | 4.99% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 11 | 1.62% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.73% | 6 | 29 | Poor |
| MAP | 5 | 0.73% | 7 | 16 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.59% | 8 | 6 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 62 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 188 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 258 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 396 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 351 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.