P S TIGHRA EAST SIDE PS 425
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP335 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 335 | 54.65% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 173 | 28.22% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 26 | 4.24% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 25 | 4.08% | |
| 5 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 23 | 3.75% | |
| 6 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 14 | 2.28% | |
| 7 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 8 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 9 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 613 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 335 | 54.21% | 1 | 51 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 173 | 27.99% | 2 | 225 | Average |
| BSP | 26 | 4.21% | 3 | 342 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 25 | 4.05% | 4 | 98 | Poor |
| AAP | 23 | 3.72% | 5 | 3 | Poor |
| AP | 14 | 2.27% | 6 | 1 | Poor |
| VIP | 7 | 1.13% | 7 | 116 | Poor |
| MAP | 5 | 0.81% | 8 | 33 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.49% | 9 | 228 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.32% | 10 | 116 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 432 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 434 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 437 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.