P S KHANPUR PS 42
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD450 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 450 | 61.98% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 136 | 18.73% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 86 | 11.85% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 28 | 3.86% | |
| 5 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 7 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 6 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 6 | 0.83% | |
| 8 | VINOD | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 726 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 450 | 61.48% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| BSP | 136 | 18.58% | 2 | 155 | Weak |
| SP | 86 | 11.75% | 3 | 379 | Weak |
| VIP | 28 | 3.83% | 4 | 11 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 0.96% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| AP | 6 | 0.82% | 6 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.82% | 7 | 54 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.41% | 9 | 18 | Poor |
| BNKP | 3 | 0.41% | 8 | 30 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 348 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 257 | Poor |
| MAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 335 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.