P S TISAULI WEST SIDE PS 414
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP302 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 302 | 72.42% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 54 | 12.95% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 45 | 10.79% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 13 | 3.12% | |
| 5 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 417 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 302 | 72.08% | 1 | 72 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 54 | 12.89% | 2 | 397 | Weak |
| BSP | 45 | 10.74% | 3 | 309 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 13 | 3.10% | 4 | 150 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.24% | 5 | 227 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.24% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 338 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 435 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 436 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 425 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 429 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 432 | Poor |
| AP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 433 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.