JHS DIHIYA KHAND 2 MIDDLE SIDE PS 385
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD331 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 331 | 58.27% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 133 | 23.42% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 58 | 10.21% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 23 | 4.05% | |
| 5 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 6 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 5 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 9 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 10 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 568 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 331 | 57.67% | 1 | 58 | Strong |
| BSP | 133 | 23.17% | 2 | 162 | Weak |
| SP | 58 | 10.10% | 3 | 408 | Weak |
| VIP | 23 | 4.01% | 4 | 19 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 6 | 1.05% | 5 | 225 | Poor |
| MAP | 5 | 0.87% | 6 | 32 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.70% | 7 | 71 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.35% | 10 | 113 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 154 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.35% | 9 | 155 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 380 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 12 | 222 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 415 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.