P S SAGHANPUR PS 381
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD186 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 186 | 43.97% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 89 | 21.04% | |
| 3 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 82 | 19.39% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 43 | 10.17% | |
| 5 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 7 | 1.65% | |
| 6 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 423 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 186 | 43.66% | 1 | 203 | Strong |
| BSP | 89 | 20.89% | 2 | 236 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 82 | 19.25% | 3 | 23 | Weak |
| SP | 43 | 10.09% | 4 | 428 | Weak |
| AAP | 7 | 1.64% | 5 | 20 | Poor |
| VIP | 6 | 1.41% | 6 | 137 | Poor |
| BDP | 3 | 0.70% | 7 | 34 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 112 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.47% | 8 | 153 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.47% | 10 | 187 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 379 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 403 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 427 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.