P S BHIWRAHAN KALA PS 337
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP212 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 212 | 41.49% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 188 | 36.79% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 95 | 18.59% | |
| 4 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 5 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 511 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 212 | 41.41% | 1 | 160 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 188 | 36.72% | 2 | 202 | Average |
| BSP | 95 | 18.55% | 3 | 224 | Weak |
| AAP | 5 | 0.98% | 4 | 38 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.78% | 5 | 212 | Poor |
| BDP | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 79 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.39% | 7 | 178 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 369 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 273 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 380 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 392 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 416 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 378 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.