JHS DEHRI WEST SIDE PS 315
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP391 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 391 | 55.62% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 166 | 23.61% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 107 | 15.22% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 24 | 3.41% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 5 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | VINOD | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 703 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 391 | 55.38% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BSP | 166 | 23.51% | 2 | 121 | Weak |
| NISHAD | 107 | 15.16% | 3 | 345 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 24 | 3.40% | 4 | 103 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.71% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.42% | 6 | 118 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 302 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 97 | Poor |
| BDP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 78 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 264 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 394 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 382 | Poor |
| MAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 405 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.