P S RASOOLPUR PS 302
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP151 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 151 | 34.79% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 120 | 27.65% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 109 | 25.12% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 9 | 2.07% | |
| 5 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 8 | 1.84% | |
| 6 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 7 | 1.61% | |
| 7 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 6 | 1.38% | |
| 8 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 6 | 1.38% | |
| 9 | VINOD | IND | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 11 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 12 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 3 | 0.69% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 434 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 151 | 34.55% | 1 | 138 | Average |
| SP | 120 | 27.46% | 2 | 306 | Average |
| NISHAD | 109 | 24.94% | 3 | 338 | Weak |
| VIP | 9 | 2.06% | 4 | 81 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 8 | 1.83% | 5 | 191 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.60% | 6 | 48 | Poor |
| BNKP | 6 | 1.37% | 7 | 8 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 1.37% | 8 | 15 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.14% | 9 | 3 | Poor |
| AP | 4 | 0.92% | 10 | 29 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.69% | 11 | 86 | Poor |
| BDP | 3 | 0.69% | 12 | 29 | Poor |
| MAP | 3 | 0.69% | 13 | 99 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.