P S BADDOPUR WEST SIDE PS 295
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP283 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 283 | 64.91% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 73 | 16.74% | |
| 3 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 55 | 12.61% | |
| 4 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 17 | 3.90% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 436 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 283 | 64.76% | 1 | 87 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 73 | 16.70% | 2 | 378 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 55 | 12.59% | 3 | 46 | Weak |
| BSP | 17 | 3.89% | 4 | 363 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.69% | 5 | 207 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 143 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.46% | 7 | 195 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 283 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 355 | Poor |
| AP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 400 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 370 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 373 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 418 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.