P S SAHAVE WEST SIDE PS 287
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP222 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 222 | 42.77% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 200 | 38.54% | |
| 3 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 60 | 11.56% | |
| 4 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 15 | 2.89% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 7 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 7 | VINOD | IND | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 519 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 222 | 42.61% | 1 | 145 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 200 | 38.39% | 2 | 180 | Average |
| AIMIM | 60 | 11.52% | 3 | 43 | Weak |
| BSP | 15 | 2.88% | 4 | 367 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.34% | 5 | 46 | Poor |
| MAP | 4 | 0.77% | 6 | 52 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.58% | 8 | 36 | Poor |
| BDP | 3 | 0.58% | 7 | 26 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.58% | 9 | 247 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.38% | 10 | 192 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 370 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 382 | Poor |
| AP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 399 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.