P S SABARHAD SOUTH SIDE PS 260
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP314 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 314 | 51.39% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 184 | 30.11% | |
| 3 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 74 | 12.11% | |
| 4 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 12 | 1.96% | |
| 5 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 6 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 6 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | VINOD | IND | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 12 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 611 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 314 | 51.22% | 1 | 64 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 184 | 30.02% | 2 | 206 | Average |
| AIMIM | 74 | 12.07% | 3 | 33 | Weak |
| INC | 12 | 1.96% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| VIP | 7 | 1.14% | 5 | 108 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 0.98% | 6 | 413 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.49% | 8 | 31 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| BDP | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 68 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.33% | 10 | 92 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.33% | 11 | 186 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 247 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.16% | 13 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.