K U M S SHAHGANJ NORTH SIDE PS 234
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP382 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 382 | 71.40% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 91 | 17.01% | |
| 3 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 41 | 7.66% | |
| 4 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 5 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 8 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 535 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 382 | 71.14% | 1 | 30 | Strong |
| NISHAD | 91 | 16.95% | 2 | 364 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 41 | 7.64% | 3 | 62 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.30% | 4 | 41 | Poor |
| SS | 5 | 0.93% | 5 | 27 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.74% | 6 | 425 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 125 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 168 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 265 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 356 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 327 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 348 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 351 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.