P S NATAULI WEST SIDE PS 231
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD638 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 638 | 79.25% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 84 | 10.43% | |
| 3 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 33 | 4.10% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 16 | 1.99% | |
| 5 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 10 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 8 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.12% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 805 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 638 | 78.28% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| SP | 84 | 10.31% | 2 | 384 | Weak |
| VIP | 33 | 4.05% | 3 | 5 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 16 | 1.96% | 4 | 130 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.23% | 5 | 391 | Poor |
| MAP | 8 | 0.98% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| BNKP | 4 | 0.49% | 7 | 22 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.49% | 8 | 139 | Poor |
| BDP | 2 | 0.25% | 10 | 66 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.25% | 9 | 137 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.25% | 11 | 183 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.12% | 12 | 238 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.12% | 13 | 184 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.