P S KAUDIYA EAST SIDE PS 226
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP386 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 386 | 54.21% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 197 | 27.67% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 108 | 15.17% | |
| 4 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 7 | 0.98% | |
| 5 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | VINOD | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 712 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 386 | 53.99% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| BSP | 197 | 27.55% | 2 | 69 | Average |
| NISHAD | 108 | 15.10% | 3 | 341 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 0.98% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| AP | 4 | 0.56% | 5 | 26 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.28% | 6 | 326 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 88 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 79 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 182 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 355 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 223 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 344 | Poor |
| MAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 383 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.