P S TAKHAPURAB EAST SIDE PS 206
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP270 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH (NISHAD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 270 | 35.67% | |
| 2 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 246 | 32.50% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 121 | 15.98% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 97 | 12.81% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 6 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 4 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 4 | 0.53% | |
| 8 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | VINOD | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 757 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 270 | 35.25% | 1 | 24 | Average |
| NISHAD | 246 | 32.11% | 2 | 137 | Average |
| SP | 121 | 15.80% | 3 | 303 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 97 | 12.66% | 4 | 15 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 0.78% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| AP | 4 | 0.52% | 6 | 24 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.52% | 7 | 55 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.39% | 8 | 240 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.26% | 9 | 130 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.26% | 10 | 76 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.26% | 11 | 152 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 336 | Poor |
| BNKP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 337 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.