P S KOPA WEST SIDE PS 190
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD206 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 206 | 49.40% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 172 | 41.25% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 12 | 2.88% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 9 | 2.16% | |
| 5 | VINOD | IND | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 7 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 8 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 9 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 417 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 206 | 49.16% | 1 | 171 | Strong |
| SP | 172 | 41.05% | 2 | 225 | Strong |
| BSP | 12 | 2.86% | 3 | 377 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 9 | 2.15% | 4 | 180 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.95% | 5 | 135 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.95% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.95% | 7 | 194 | Poor |
| BNKP | 3 | 0.72% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.48% | 9 | 174 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 229 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 339 | Poor |
| BDP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 326 | Poor |
| MAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.