P S PATTI WEST SIDE PS 184
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD252 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 252 | 46.84% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 155 | 28.81% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 108 | 20.07% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 14 | 2.60% | |
| 5 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 538 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 252 | 46.75% | 1 | 127 | Strong |
| BSP | 155 | 28.76% | 2 | 132 | Average |
| SP | 108 | 20.04% | 3 | 339 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 14 | 2.60% | 4 | 142 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.56% | 5 | 238 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.37% | 6 | 83 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 246 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 347 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 153 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 217 | Poor |
| AP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 359 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 301 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 382 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.