P S DANAPUR PS 179
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP255 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 255 | 37.78% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 248 | 36.74% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 158 | 23.41% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 6 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | VINOD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 675 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 255 | 37.44% | 1 | 30 | Average |
| SP | 248 | 36.42% | 2 | 117 | Average |
| NISHAD | 158 | 23.20% | 3 | 255 | Weak |
| VIP | 5 | 0.73% | 4 | 149 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.44% | 5 | 189 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.29% | 6 | 81 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 244 | Poor |
| AP | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 226 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 150 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 274 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 333 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 416 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 299 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.