JHS GAIRWAH WESTSIDE PS 162
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP306 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 306 | 43.78% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 275 | 39.34% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 93 | 13.30% | |
| 4 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 5 | 0.72% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 699 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 306 | 42.74% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| SP | 275 | 38.41% | 2 | 95 | Average |
| NISHAD | 93 | 12.99% | 3 | 359 | Weak |
| AP | 5 | 0.70% | 4 | 11 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.56% | 5 | 44 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.56% | 6 | 131 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.56% | 7 | 189 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 169 | Poor |
| BNKP | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 77 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 142 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 163 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 143 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 412 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.