P S SALEMPUR PS 136
SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI
SPSP265 votes at this polling station
over INDAR DEV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 265 | 39.85% | |
| 2 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 186 | 27.97% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 167 | 25.11% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 30 | 4.51% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 665 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 265 | 39.73% | 1 | 99 | Average |
| BSP | 186 | 27.89% | 2 | 90 | Average |
| NISHAD | 167 | 25.04% | 3 | 238 | Average |
| VIP | 30 | 4.50% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.75% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| MAP | 4 | 0.60% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| AP | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 101 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 312 | Poor |
| BDP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 135 | Poor |
| BNKP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 152 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 255 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 320 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.