JHS BUDUPUR WEST SIDE PS 113
RAMESH
NISHADNISHAD453 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 453 | 62.83% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 113 | 15.67% | |
| 3 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 70 | 9.71% | |
| 4 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 58 | 8.04% | |
| 5 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 10 | 1.39% | |
| 6 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | VINOD | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 721 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 453 | 62.57% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| SP | 113 | 15.61% | 2 | 321 | Weak |
| BSP | 70 | 9.67% | 3 | 259 | Poor |
| VIP | 58 | 8.01% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 10 | 1.38% | 5 | 171 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 0.97% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| MAP | 4 | 0.55% | 7 | 41 | Poor |
| BDP | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 49 | Poor |
| BNKP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 156 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 193 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 332 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 145 | Poor |
| AP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 337 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.