P S SURAPUR EAST SIDE PS 1
INDAR DEV
BSPBSP302 votes at this polling station
over SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDAR DEV | BSP | 302 | 43.27% | |
| 2 | SHAILENDRA YADAV LALAI | SP | 221 | 31.66% | |
| 3 | RAMESH | NISHAD | 122 | 17.48% | |
| 4 | NAYAB AHMAD KHAN | AIMIM | 15 | 2.15% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ ALAM | INC | 13 | 1.86% | |
| 6 | RAMANUJ | VIP | 7 | 1.00% | |
| 7 | RAM PRATAP | BNKP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | JITENDRA KUMAR | BDP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | SURESH RAJBHAR | AP | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | VINOD | IND | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | RAM SUMER | MAP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 12 | KAPIL DEV | SS | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 13 | VINOD KUMAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 698 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 302 | 42.66% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| SP | 221 | 31.21% | 2 | 147 | Average |
| NISHAD | 122 | 17.23% | 3 | 315 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 15 | 2.12% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 1.84% | 5 | 7 | Poor |
| VIP | 7 | 0.99% | 6 | 97 | Poor |
| BDP | 4 | 0.56% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| BNKP | 4 | 0.56% | 8 | 11 | Poor |
| AP | 3 | 0.42% | 9 | 34 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.42% | 10 | 13 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.28% | 11 | 114 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.28% | 12 | 140 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 275 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 365, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.