P S KAVELI PS 54
MANOJ
BSPBSP267 votes at this polling station
over OMPRAKASH BABA DUBEY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANOJ | BSP | 267 | 57.05% | |
| 2 | OMPRAKASH BABA DUBEY | SP | 102 | 21.79% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHANDRA MISHRA | BJP | 81 | 17.31% | |
| 4 | RAJESH VISHWAKARMA | JAP | 8 | 1.71% | |
| 5 | SABHAJIT | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 6 | HARI PRASAD SHUKLA | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | ARTI SINGH | INC | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | ANIL KUMAR SINGH | HSP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | SUMIT SINGH | VSIP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | SUSHMA MISHRA | BDNP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | SUBEDAR GAUTAM | BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM GOVIND SINGH | SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAHUL SHARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SEEMA JAISWAL | RSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 468 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 267 | 56.81% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| SP | 102 | 21.70% | 2 | 323 | Weak |
| BJP | 81 | 17.23% | 3 | 360 | Weak |
| JAP | 8 | 1.70% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.06% | 5 | 107 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 275 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 273 | Poor |
| BDNP | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 138 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 106 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 230 | Poor |
| SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 194 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 209 | Poor |
| BRDP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 304 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 364, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.