P S GOTHAWA PS 390
OMPRAKASH BABA DUBEY
SPSP260 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OMPRAKASH BABA DUBEY | SP | 260 | 54.28% | |
| 2 | MANOJ | BSP | 193 | 40.29% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHANDRA MISHRA | BJP | 11 | 2.30% | |
| 4 | SUMIT SINGH | VSIP | 4 | 0.84% | |
| 5 | SABHAJIT | IND | 3 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | ARTI SINGH | INC | 3 | 0.63% | |
| 7 | SEEMA JAISWAL | RSP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | RAJESH VISHWAKARMA | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | RAM GOVIND SINGH | SUCI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | SUBEDAR GAUTAM | BRDP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | HARI PRASAD SHUKLA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHMA MISHRA | BDNP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAHUL SHARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ANIL KUMAR SINGH | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 479 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 260 | 54.17% | 1 | 91 | Strong |
| BSP | 193 | 40.21% | 2 | 30 | Strong |
| BJP | 11 | 2.29% | 3 | 394 | Poor |
| VSIP | 4 | 0.83% | 4 | 40 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.63% | 5 | 265 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.63% | 6 | 249 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 94 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 166 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 208 | Poor |
| BRDP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 294 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 394 | Poor |
| BDNP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 394 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 392 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 364, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.